1
Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National in Relation to Alleged Plan to Steal Proprietary AI Technology
zeldacuevas747 edited this page 1 year ago
A.gov site belongs to a main federal government organization in the United States.
Secure.gov sites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// means you've safely linked to the.gov site. Share sensitive details only on official, .
- About - The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases - Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents - Forms - Publications - Details for Victims in Large Cases - Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice? - Benefits - DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About - News - Internships
- FOIA
- Contact
- Details for Journalists
- About - title=" About" About - The Attorney General
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance - History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News - Press Releases - Speeches - Videos - Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources - Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Details for Victims in Large Cases - Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment - Why Justice? - Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices - Find Aid
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
- Office of Public Affairs
- News
- Press Releases
- Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National In Relation To Alleged Plan To Steal Proprietary AI Technology
MENU News
- All News - Blogs
- Photo Galleries - Podcasts
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
Archived Press Releases
Archived News
Para Notícias en Español
Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National in Relation to Alleged Plan to Steal Proprietary AI Technology
- Facebook - X. - LinkedIn.
- Email
Note: View the superseding indictment here.
A federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment today charging Linwei Ding, also called Leon Ding, 38, with seven counts of economic espionage and seven counts of theft of trade tricks in connection with a supposed plan to take from Google LLC (Google) exclusive details associated with AI technology.
Ding was at first arraigned in March 2024 on four counts of theft of trade tricks. The superseding indictment returned today explains seven categories of trade secrets stolen by Ding and charges Ding with 7 counts of economic espionage and seven counts of theft of trade secrets.
According to the superseding indictment, Google worked with Ding as a software application engineer in 2019. Between approximately May 2022 and May 2023, Ding uploaded more than 1,000 special files containing Google personal details from Google's network to his individual Google Cloud account, including the trade secrets declared in the superseding indictment.
While Ding was utilized by Google, he covertly connected himself with two People's Republic of China (PRC)- based innovation business. Around June 2022, Ding remained in conversations to be the Chief Technology Officer for an early-stage technology company based in the PRC. By May 2023, Ding had established his own technology business focused on AI and artificial intelligence in the PRC and was functioning as the company's CEO.
The superseding indictment alleges that Ding intended to benefit the PRC federal government by stealing trade tricks from Google. Ding apparently stole innovation associating with the hardware infrastructure and software platform that enables Google's supercomputing information center to train and serve large AI designs. The trade tricks contain detailed details about the architecture and performance of Google's Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) chips and systems and Google's Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) systems, the software application that allows the chips to interact and carry out jobs, and the software application that orchestrates thousands of chips into a supercomputer capable of training and executing cutting-edge AI work. The trade secrets likewise pertain to Google's custom-made SmartNIC, a kind of network interface card utilized to boost Google's GPU, high performance, and cloud networking products.
As alleged, Ding distributed a PowerPoint presentation to workers of his technology business pointing out PRC nationwide policies motivating the development of the domestic AI market. He likewise created a PowerPoint presentation containing an application to a PRC talent program based in Shanghai. The superseding indictment explains how PRC-sponsored talent programs incentivize individuals participated in research study and advancement outside the PRC to transmit that understanding and research study to the PRC in exchange for incomes, research study funds, laboratory space, or surgiteams.com other incentives. Ding's application for the talent program mentioned that his business's item "will assist China to have computing power facilities abilities that are on par with the international level."
If founded guilty, Ding deals with an optimum penalty of ten years in jail and approximately a $250,000 fine for each trade-secret count and 15 years in jail and $5,000,000 fine for each economic-espionage count. A federal district court judge will identify any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory elements.
The FBI is examining the case.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Casey Boome and Molly K. Priedeman for the Northern District of California and Trial Attorneys Stephen Marzen and Yifei Zheng of the National Security Division's Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.
Today's action was coordinated through the Justice and Commerce Departments' Disruptive Technology Strike Force. The Disruptive Technology Strike Force is an interagency police strike force co-led by the Departments of Justice and Commerce designed to target illicit stars, secure supply chains, and prevent important innovation from being obtained by authoritarian routines and hostile nation-states.
A superseding indictment is simply a claims. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.